Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.consciousness,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.philosophy.meta,rec.arts.books
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!oz
From: oz@nexus.yorku.ca (ozan s. yigit)
Subject: Re: Penrose and Searle (was Re: Roger Penrose's fixed ideas)
In-Reply-To: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk's message of Thu, 17 Nov 1994 23:40:31 GMT
Message-ID: <OZ.94Nov18233146@nexus.yorku.ca>
Sender: news@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca (USENET News System)
Organization: The Electric Skillet
References: <39ofgk$7rb@news-rocq.inria.fr> <39oqc8$9gb@news-rocq.inria.fr>
	<39posv$mr0@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca> <CzFr3J.990@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Distribution: inet
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 1994 04:31:46 GMT
Lines: 10
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.skeptic:95662 comp.ai.philosophy:22287 sci.philosophy.meta:14869

Jeff Dalton:

   I agree.  Nonetheless, the TT is fiercely defended.

fiercely defended where? the only actual defense is an article
by dennett. give some real references to the literature. and try
to remember that comp.ai.phil is not an adequate sample of the
ai/cog-sci/philosophy community.

oz
