Return-Path: <Eric_Kischell@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU>
Received: from IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU by A.GP.CS.CMU.EDU id aa13297;
          2 Aug 96 15:07:45 EDT
Received: from IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU by IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU id aa13460;
          2 Aug 96 15:07:14 EDT
To: Brad.Myers@cs.cmu.edu
cc: sumitha+@andrew.CMU.EDU, elie+@andrew.CMU.EDU, keesh@cs.cmu.edu
Subject: IOS project's life from 15-820 (B) Interface Software to -> 
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 96 15:07:09 -0400
Message-ID: <13458.839012829@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU>
From: Eric_Kischell@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU

Dr. Myers,

	The intraoperative surgical interface(IOS) was utilized a few weeks
ago for a cadaver study at Shadyside Hospital.  IOS ran without
incident.  The current system integrates most supporting applications sans
the registration app(which will undergo major cleanup and usability studies)
into a single process.  In addition IOS now includes support for two footpedals
and the optotrak sensor, audio, etc.

	  Additional user requests are being incorporated into IOS with
a carefull eye to usability issues.  Prior to the cadaver study, I performed 
a code walkthrough for bug fixes && cleanup.  I am currently examining
packages to support multithreading audio, footpedal, etc.  If you are
interested I will let you know when/if IOS is used for "fresh-frozen"
and "living" patients.

e.-


      



