Return-Path: <ralucav@COBRA.CRCL.cs.cmu.edu>
Received: from COBRA.CRCL.CS.CMU.EDU by ux4.sp.cs.cmu.edu id aa31446;
          4 Oct 2001 18:10 EDT
From: "Luis J. Cota" <lcota@andrew.cmu.edu>
Newsgroups: cmu.misc.market
Subject: Re: photo developers which post pix on-line?
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:40:34 -0400
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L-022.0109281439420.6234-100000@motrin.weh.andrew.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

i think Fotoshop does PictureCD. I believe they purchased this machine,
hwoever, its quality is not too great. The resulting slides are not very
useful for making prints.


_______________________
Luis Cota
www.kubire.com

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gopi D Flaherty wrote:

> Excerpts from cmu.misc.market: 28-Sep-101 Re: photo developers which ..
> by Christopher Colohan@cs.c
> > - They do it in house.  It can be faster to get photos developed to
> > photocd than to prints, as their photocd machine is not as busy.
> > (Last time I had them done they gave me same day service at their
> > non-rush rates.)
>
> PhotoCD is a trademarked Kodak product. Fotoshop does _not_ do PhotoCD
> in-house; I know this for a fact because the last roll I had done, Kodak
> totally screwed up. They eventually dealt with it by scanning them
> in-house. I don't know what scanning the normally do in-house, but
> PhotoCD is something that gets sent out with ~1 week turnaround.
>
>
>

------- End of forwarded message -------
