Received: from ARM.RI.CMU.EDU by K.CS.CMU.EDU; 16 Oct 86 09:57:54 EDT
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 86 09:49:27 EDT
From: Donald.Schmitz@ARM.RI.CMU.EDU
To: bovik@k
Subject: Mutual funds and Life Insurance

These are responses to a request for information on AL Williams and their
scheme of convincing you to dump you whole life insurance, buy their term
insurance (which seems expensive), and invest the rest in mutual funds
brokered by them.  


Received: from IUS2.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  7 Oct 86 14:34:54 EDT
Date:  7 Oct 1986 14:33-EDT 
From: Jon.Webb@ius2.cs.cmu.edu
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
Message-Id: <529094007/webb@ius2.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: Donald.Schmitz's bboard message of 07-Oct-86 13:59

There's an article about A. L. Williams (and life insurance in general)
in recent issues of Consumer Reports.  Basically, their impression is
the same as yours: expensive term insurance is no better a deal than
expensive whole life. -- J

Received: from C.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  7 Oct 86 14:47:58 EDT
Received: ID <HUFF@C.CS.CMU.EDU>; Tue 7 Oct 86 14:49:46-EDT
Date: Tue 7 Oct 86 14:41:20-EDT
From: Charles.Huff@C.CS.CMU.EDU
Subject: mutual funds
To: schmitz@ARM.RI.CMU.EDU
Message-ID: <12244950373.16.HUFF@C.CS.CMU.EDU>

The editor of MONEY magazine (Arthur Loeb, I think) has written a book
on personal finance, in which he discusses this topic.  He makes the same
recommendation you have heard, but counsels no-load mutual funds (ones
you don't give a %age to a broker for).  I highly recommend the book.
-------

Received: from CAD.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  7 Oct 86 15:48:07 EDT
Date:  7 Oct 1986 15:46-EDT 
From: Robert.Frederking@cad.cs.cmu.edu
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
Message-Id: <529098390/ref@cad.cs.cmu.edu>

	Well, I may be prejudiced, but I think New York Life is a
reputable company to talk to about insurance-related issues (my father
works for them in Arizona).  Of course, a lot depends on the individual
agent.

	Bob

Received: from X.SEI.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  7 Oct 86 18:08:11 EDT
Date: Tuesday, 7 October 1986 18:05:59 EDT
From: Patrick.Donohoe@sei.cmu.edu
To: Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: A.L. Williams
Message-Id: <1986.10.7.21.48.8.Patrick.Donohoe@sei.cmu.edu>

   Don,

      Consumer Reports, June, July, and August 1986 had a special feature
   on Life Insurance.  One of these (sorry, I can't remember which one)
   had a section on the activities of A.L. Williams.  The section basically
   said that the Williams argument - buy term and invest the difference -
   was sound, but that the methods used and the prices charged by Williams
   were suspect.

   Other refs: There are books on life insurance in Squirrel Hill library
   with titles like "How Life Insurance Companies Rob You" and "The Life
   Insurance Game"; they contain interesting info. and figures on the "buy
   term and invest the difference" approach.   One of these - I'm not sure
   which one - also dislikes A.L. Williams.

   Honest investment advisers: I think the terms are mutually exclusive.
   Even the ones who don't lie still don't tell you the full story.


   Pat D.

Received: from K.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  7 Oct 86 22:38:02 EDT
Date: 7 Oct 1986 22:22-EST
From: Duane.Williams@k.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Term life insurance
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Message-Id: <529122173/dtw@k.cs.cmu.edu>

While I personally think that many people buy life insurance without
any need for it at all, one source of information that you might find
useful is Consumer Reports.  They ran a series on various kinds of life
insurance in recent issues, i.e., within the last six months or so.
They published charts comparing the cost of various kinds based on
surveys of a large number of well known insurance companies.  There was
an issue that focussed on term insurance.  I'm sure that you can find
Consumer Reports in the library.

-Duane

Received: from G.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  8 Oct 86 03:34:36 EDT
Date: 8 Oct 1986 03:27-EST
From: Unilogic@g.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Message-Id: <529140445/unilog@g.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu's bboard message of 07-Oct-86 13:25    

Check out "Consumer Reports" issues from June, July, and August '86.
They performed an in-depth analysis of whole, term, and universal life
insurance policies with detailed ratings of policies from various
companies.  June covers term life, July whole, and August universal.

In particular, there is a special artical devoted to A. L. Williams in
the July issue entitled "A. L. Williams:  Right Idea, Wrong Execution".
Their general concensus is that Williams is correct in pushing term
life over whole life (nothing new there though, as Consumer Reports has
been recomending the same thing for many years) but that their policy
rated as one of the worst available.

Hope this helps.

						Dave Gentzel
						Unilogic, Ltd.

P.S. A subscription to Consumer Reports is one of the best investments
I ever made.

Received: from THEORY.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  8 Oct 86 10:45:44 EDT
Date:  8 Oct 1986 10:30-EDT 
From: Rex.Dwyer@theory.cs.cmu.edu
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
Message-Id: <529165806/rad@theory.cs.cmu.edu>

Don,

Term Insurance + Mutual Funds is exactly the scheme recommended in 
"What's Wrong with Your Life Insurance" by M.Dacey. 
(He also wrote "How to Avoid Probate".)  But I guess if the term
insurance is unnecesarily expensive, it's not a great buy.  I know this
is not exactly what your asking for, but I believe the term life offered by
ACM is extremely competitive.  After reading Dacey's book, I borrowed
the entire cash value of a whole life policy I had and put the loan in
my IRA.  As long as interest rates stay above 5%, I'm making money --
and I got a nice tax write-off.  I think the wisdom of the decision is
reflected in the frequency with which the insurance company offers me
easy repayment plans.

I could lend you the book if you can't find it elsewhere.

				- Rex

Received: from A.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  8 Oct 86 18:07:54 EDT
Date:  8 Oct 86 18:00:40 EDT
From: David.Black@A.CS.CMU.EDU
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu

Get the annual Forbes issue on mutual funds to learn more than you ever
wanted to know about this subject.   Some initial pearls of wisdom:

Invest in a no-load mutual fund.  Most funds charge a load or commision
	of up to 7% on initial investments and/or withdrawls, but there
	is no consistent return in better performance.

Don't evaluate mutual funds based on short-term returns.  What counts is
	consistently beating the averages and market over the long haul.
	Only Forbes does this type of in depth evaluation; the competing
	evaluation in Money isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

The Forbes issue also has phone numbers to get prospectuses of any mutual
funds you may be interested in.

--Dave


Received: from F.GP.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU;  9 Oct 86 17:03:50 EDT
Date:  9 Oct 1986 16:59-EDT 
From: Marc.Ringuette@f.gp.cs.cmu.edu
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
Message-Id: <529275566/mnr@f.gp.cs.cmu.edu>

I agree that the best plan when dealing with a life insurance agent is
to get term insurance, if you need it -- just pay for what you need.
Investments should be considered, well, as investments, not something
your insurance agent allows to happen to you.  And on the subject of 
investments, the best I've come up with is mutual funds.  If one is 
willing to put in the research to find companies with good growth
potential, the stock market is also good, and I expect to be investing
in stocks in the fairly near future.      ---> Marc

Received: from H.CS.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU; 10 Oct 86 15:50:57 EDT
Date: 10 Oct 1986 15:32-EDT 
From: Spencer.Star@h.cs.cmu.edu
To: Donald.Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Mutual Funds
Message-Id: <529356772/star@h.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: Donald.Schmitz's bboard message of 07-Oct-86 13:27

There are lots of mutual funds out there--more than 1500.  About two
thirds do not do as well as the market average.  The moral is to choose
your mutual fund carefully.  Don't let your insurance agent do it for
you. There are a few books out that list no-load funds and their
performance in past years.  Barrons newspaper is published every Sunday
and it gives a report on the performance of almost all the mutual funds
four times a year.  The third quarterly report probably just came out
or will be out in a couple of weeks.  Consumer reports had an article
on mutual funds about 1-2 years ago.  Business Week publishes a very
good resume of mutual fund performance a few times a year.  Your best
bet is to pick the no-load or low-load (0 to 3% commission) funds that
have performed best during the last 3 to 5 years and that are still
accepting new money. (Many have closed the fund to new clients.)  Also,
of course, look closely at the fund's objectives, e.g., captial
appreciation vs steady income.  Do you want to invest in an
international fund?

To shortcut all the research, invest in Fidelity's Puritan Fund for a
relatively conservative investment, Fidelity's Overseas Fund for
diversification (and some risk) and Fidelity's Select Precious Metals
fund if you think gold will go up and inflation is on the horizon (I
don't know, but it might be worthwhile as a small part of your
portfolio.)  Why Fidelity?  They offer the best array of services, and
the two funds I mentioned are quite good performers.

Good luck.

Received: from OHM.ECE.CMU.EDU by ARM.RI.CMU.EDU; 10 Oct 86 17:25:54 EDT
Received: by ohm.ECE.CMU.EDU (4.12/4.7)
	id <AA05343 rhe>; Fri, 10 Oct 86 17:06:57 edt;
Date: Friday, 10 October 1986 17:06:55 EDT
Sender: Richard.Edahl@ohm.ECE.CMU.EDU
From: Richard.Edahl@ohm.ece.cmu.edu
To: Schmitz@arm.ri.cmu.edu
Subject: Al Williams
Message-Id: <1986.10.10.20.49.22.Richard.Edahl@ohm>

Don --

First, besides merely selling insurance, Al Williams appears to be involved
in a 'pyramid' scheme of agents recruiting other agents and getting a cut of
their recruits' commissions, but passing on a portion to the person who
recruited him.

The whole idea of using term insurance and doing your own investing as
opposed to buying whole life insurance is not new.  Actually, whole life is
not as much as a rip-off as some would make it out to be.  (Whole life is
really a decreasing face-value term insurance policy plus a tax-sheltered
investment.  It is decreasing face-value because the whole life policy has a
cash value [representing the investment portion] that increases over time.
Hence the term only has to cover the whole life insurance face-value minus
the cash value.)    Whole life (and now universal life) have certain
characteristics that makes it appealing.  

1) The income is tax sheltered until you begin withdrawing it.

2) It is a 'forced savings' method.  (This is not very important.)

3) Unlike a tax-sheltered IRA, you can borrow against it at a low interest
rate.

4) Unlike a tax-sheltered IRA, you can cash it in without penalty.  (But you
must pay taxes on the appreciation.)

5) The insurance company guarantees a certain modest rate of return.  All in
all, the actual rate of return is roughly comparable to a CD.

That is, investment, a whole life policy acts like a CD in an IRA, but with
more advantages.  It is not an agressive investment, but is certainly to be
considered as a part of a portfolio for most people.  


					Rick


