Return-Path: <Andrew.Hastings@m.gp.cs.cmu.edu>
Received: from m.gp.cs.cmu.edu by K.GP.CS.CMU.EDU id aa09816;
          2 Aug 91 15:28:24 EDT
Received: from Messages.7.8.N.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.M.GP.CS.CMU.EDU.rt.r3
          via MS.5.6.M.GP.CS.CMU.EDU.rt_r3;
          Fri,  2 Aug 91 15:27:29 -0400 (EDT)
ReSent-Message-ID: <ccaP8Vi00hYP9NFkhp@cs.cmu.edu>
ReSent-Date: Fri,  2 Aug 91 15:27:29 -0400 (EDT)
ReSent-From: Andrew.Hastings@cs.cmu.edu
ReSent-To: Harry.Bovik@cs.cmu.edu
X-Andrew-WideReply: org.cs.general
X-Added: With Flames (uniquebb $Revision: 1.1 $)
Return-path: <Postmaster@CRABAPPLE.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU>
To: post-general@CRABAPPLE.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU
Xref: crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu misc.consumers:40213 cmu.cs.general:5102
Path: crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!abh
From: Andrew Hastings <abh+@cs.cmu.edu>
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,cmu.cs.general
Subject: check printing summary (long)
Message-Id: <14160@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 2 Aug 91 18:23:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 93
Nntp-Posting-Host: pogo.camelot.cs.cmu.edu
Originator: abh@POGO.CAMELOT.CS.CMU.EDU
Sender: news@CRABAPPLE.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU


	Almost everyone reported having no problems with alternate
check printers.  The most popular choice was Current (mentioned
by 13 respondents), with 8 respondents using Checks In The Mail.

	DC Chuang <bbs.dchuang@doomsday.spies.com> writes:
>   According to Consumer Reports (or some similar publication)
>independent check printers will save you money.  The two they listed
>were Current, Inc. (800-426-0822) and Checks In the Mail
>(800-733-4443), both charge $4.95 for the first 200 checks.
Jennifer.Kay@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU and Richard.Lewis@cs.cmu.edu also
mentioned the Consumer Reports article.

	Karen York Kietzke <ky@VARICOSE.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU>, Ravinder
Bhumbla <rbhumbla@ucsd.edu>, and David Seth Meyers <gt9022a@prism.gatech.edu>
provided contact information:
    Current Inc				Checks In The Mail
    Check Printing Dept			P O Box 7802
    PO Box 19000			Irwindale, CA  91706
    Colorado Springs, CO 80935-9000	(800) 422-2439
    (800) 426-0822			(800) 733-4443

    Signature Classics			Image Checks
    Keller Check			(800) 562-8768
    917 Colmar Avenue
    Salt Lake City, UT  84104		Federal Check Printers
    (800) 999-9755			(800) 543-3922

	Bob Rowe <rowe@sj.ATE.SLB.COM> offered the following advice:
>        Yes, we have used the ads in the Sunday paper for years. The best
>way to approach it is to use the ad for the first set of checks only.
>Usually the next order is much more expensive. While using those checks,
>keep looking for another ad and save it. When the first set of checks is
>nearly depleted, send in the ad for your next batch of "initial" checks. We
>have never had a problem with anybody accepting them. Hope this helps.

	Timothy J. Lee <timlee@btr.com> suggests:
>As far as your bank honoring checks printed by someone else, check
>your bank.  Most only require that the magnetic numbers are printed
>correctly, which cheapos like Current and Checks-in-the-Mail do.
>Also check the bank's disclosure statement -- some require that you
>use their own checks, or get approval in advance.

	Eric Cooper <ecc@ECC.NECTAR.CS.CMU.EDU> also notes:
>The check numbers on perhaps 5 out of 1000 checks
>couldn't be read electronically, and that may have been due to my
>keeping them folded up in my wallet for months at a time.

	Joseph M. Newcomer <jn11+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>I tried this because I was not happy with the quality produced.  After
>two months of searching, the answer is: you can't get it done at a
>reasonable price anywhere except at the bank.  Deluxe (a real bunch of
>turkey yahoos) has the best price.  Also, the order has to be validated
>by the bank so they know you aren't getting someone else's account
>number on your check (because you could then take the money and run).

	Michael Skokin <NU104043@VM1.NoDak.EDU> cautions:
>I wondered about the same thing till a bank customer rep. told me that some of
>these printers sell the account numbers to outsiders and there is a chance that
>you may end up with an empty account. Now I don't know if the printers the bank
>uses doesn't do the same thing, but I believe that you could sue someone (the
>bank) if this happens (or rather blow up their offices).

	Thanks to all who responded:
tp0x@SPICA.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU
trm@GS46.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
gt1762c@prism.gatech.edu
ecc@ECC.NECTAR.CS.CMU.EDU
Sammy.Tao@SPEECH1.CS.CMU.EDU
Jennifer.Kay@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU
Betsy.Herk@ISL1.RI.CMU.EDU
ky@VARICOSE.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU
cec@leland.stanford.edu
u4944@snoid.cray.com
Richard.Lewis@MIXO.SOAR.CS.CMU.EDU
jb15+@andrew.cmu.edu
wolfe@vw.ece.cmu.edu
sgc@SEI.CMU.EDU
timlee@btr.com
gt9022a@prism.gatech.edu
mlz@mlz.speech.cs.cmu.edu
mattp@godiva.sps.mot.com
jad@chaos.arh.cdc.com
elle@midway.uchicago.edu
rbhumbla@ucsd.edu
skarthik@tucker.intel.com
rowe@sj.ATE.SLB.COM
jn11+@andrew.cmu.edu
duveneck@vacs.uwp.edu
NU104043@VM1.NoDak.EDU
bbs.dchuang@doomsday.spies.com

-Andy Hastings			abh@cs.cmu.edu			412/268-8734
